In touch with the world ... at home on the High Plains

Some Things to Know About the WHO's Red Meat Announcement

In light of the World Health Organization’s much-discussed classification this week of red meat as a carcinogen, Smithsonian.com has published a few helpful clarifications about the announcement.

First, the term “carcinogen” is frightening, but it can be misleading. The WHO doesn’t have separate categories according to how carcinogenic a substance is. Thus, plutonium and bacon fall into the same category, though one is obviously more dangerous than the other (Hint: It’s not the bacon).

Also, not all meat is included in the classification. Only red meats and processed meats are included. Meats like fish and chicken were not evaluated.

Third, the experts aren’t suggesting that everyone abandon meat. Simply eat meat in moderation.

The report also doesn’t give any clue as to how meat should be cooked or consumed. So, be aware that some cooking methods could be less harmful than others.

Lastly, the WHO’s announcement could possibly be incorporated into the USDA’s dietary guidelines. So look out for that.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  1. Drought causes North Texas ranchers to reduce herds, driving meat prices up
  2. Colorado gave farmers the right to repair their own equipment, but Midwest farmers still waiting
  3. Black vultures are killing newborn livestock in the Midwest — and their territory is expanding
  4. One year after wildfires, Kansas ranchers vow to ‘get by ... somehow’
  5. New research shows prairie dogs may be more friend than foe to Texas ranchers