© 2025
In touch with the world ... at home on the High Plains
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Our translator station serving St. Francis and Cheyenne County at 96.3 FM is off the air due to an air conditioning breakdown at its leased transmitter site, making it too hot for HPPR's equipment to operate. We are currently working to fix the situation. We apologize for the loss of service and ask listeners to tune to KZNK at 90.1 FM or listen on line through the player above or HPPR's mobile app.

Should State Reps Be Paid More?

National Conference of State Legislatures
/
fivethirtyeight

Are higher-paid legislators better at running their states? There are two schools of thought. Many experts believe when it comes to state government, you get what you pay for. Conversely, states where lawmakers bring in higher salaries have often been linked with corruption. Even so, states like Texas with a very low legislative income are certainly not free from corruption. And low pay can limit state representation to the wealthy. For example, states like New Mexico have short legislative sessions, and lawmakers must leave their day jobs for one or two months every year and travel to the state capital. New Mexican lawmakers aren’t compensated at all for their service.

Here’s how the High Plains states stack up where legislative salaries are concerned:

At $51,960, Colorado legislators make about 15% less than the state’s median household income.

At $48,804, Oklahoma legislators make about 3% more than the state’s median household income.

At $27,761, Kansas legislators make about 47% less than the state’s median household income.

At $21,482, Nebraska legislators make about 60% less than the state’s median household income.

At $17,700, Texas legislators make about 66% less than the state’s median household income.

Only 12 states (including Oklahoma) pay their state legislators a salary that matches or exceeds the state’s median household income.