-
Replacement would wait two years for an election under 2025 state law, which conflicts with U.S. Constitution
-
At issue is Schwab’s decision to dissolve the No Labels Kansas party after an affiliate with the national No Labels political organization alleged nominations made by Van Meteren and Miller were fraudulent.
-
Schwab said he does not “cater to the loud minority.”
-
Morgan, who previously sought the statewide office as a Republican in 2014, said his goal was to make certain the state’s chief elections officer put interests of Kansas voters ahead of any attempt to create partisan advantages in politics.
-
Party didn't fulfill plan to nominate candidates for president, vice president
-
Users can view proposed regulations, search an in-progress archival catalogue and subscribe to email notices for scheduled public hearings.
-
The U.S. Department of Justice claimed in court it already has sensitive data on voters so it can check for people who should not be registered. However, the Kansas secretary of state said none of that information has been shared.
-
United Kansas Party challenges 125-year prohibition on multiparty nominations
-
Counties also would have to figure out how to handle primary ballots, where only registered Republicans and Democrats can vote in their party’s races while nonpartisan elections would be conducted at the same time.
-
Kansas Legislature's leaders and elected state officers challenge Gov. Laura Kelly's perspective. The governor claims constitutional authority to "stand up for Kansans." The Kansas Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Jan. 16.